Loading...

Generating PDF ...

  1. Endogenous Fields & Mind › 
  2. Endogenous Electromagnetic Fields › 
  3. Electromagnetism & Cancer
zoom-in section zoom-out section

Electromagnetism & Cancer
The break of coherence of endogenous electromagnetic fields is the key precursor of cancer

Pablo Andueza Munduate

Cancer is increasingly understood as a disease influenced by the disruption of endogenous electromagnetic (EM) fields. Evidence suggests that coherence and energy regulation in these fields play vital roles in maintaining cellular and tissue homeostasis. ...

This section synthesizes insights into the relationship between EM field disturbances and carcinogenesis, emphasizing experimental findings, bioelectric models, and potential interventions using coherent EM fields to restore systemic balance and inhibit tumor progression.

The origins of cancer have long been attributed to genetic mutations and biochemical abnormalities. However, a growing body of research highlights the role of physical and electromagnetic disruptions in carcinogenesis. This perspective views cancer as a result of decoherence in the bioelectric and electromagnetic fields that regulate cellular activities and tissue organization. This section explores how disruptions in these fields contribute to cancer development and discusses emerging therapeutic approaches leveraging coherent EM fields to combat malignancies.

Mechanisms of Electromagnetic Disruption in Cancer:

  • Decoherence of Endogenous Fields:

    • Cancer cells exhibit disrupted electromagnetic coherence, linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and the Warburg effect, where abnormal energy metabolism alters electromagnetic properties (Pokorný et al., 2020).

    • EM field disturbances in cancerous tissues result in impaired long-range interactions and reduced control over cellular organization, favoring random genetic mutations and malignant transformation.

  • Water Structure and Resonance Shifts:

    • Research indicates that the molecular structure of intracellular water changes from a hexagonal to a cubic phase in cancer cells, disrupting their resonant electromagnetic frequencies (Kalantaryan et al., 2024).

    • Tumor growth or regression is associated with the balance of resonant EM waves between healthy and cancerous tissues, influencing the electromagnetic environment at tumor boundaries.

  • Bioelectric Dysregulation:

    • Carcinogenesis is linked to the breakdown of bioelectric communication through membrane depolarization and disrupted ion channel function (Carvalho, 2022).

    • Bioelectric gradients, critical for tissue homeostasis, are altered in cancer, leading to unchecked cellular proliferation and a loss of organizational integrity.

Experimental Evidence of Electromagnetic Influence in Cancer:

  • Cancer-Specific Electromagnetic Signatures:

    • Studies using dielectrophoresis reveal that cancer stem cells have distinct electromagnetic properties compared to differentiated cells, reflecting changes in intracellular content and coherence (Barthout et al., 2022).

    • Biophotonic emissions in malignant cells differ in wavelength and intensity from non-cancerous cells, correlating with cellular stress markers and genetic activity (Murugan et al., 2023).

  • Tumor Microenvironment and EM Fields:

    • Measurements of electric fields around breast cancer tumors indicate inhomogeneous currents and voltage gradients, supporting the presence of endogenous electromagnetic circuits influencing tumor behavior (Zhu et al., 2020).

    • Disrupted electromagnetic signaling within the tumor microenvironment contributes to metastasis and resistance to conventional therapies.

Therapeutic Applications of Coherent EM Fields:

  • Restoration of Coherence:

    • Exposure to coherent non-ionizing electromagnetic fields has been shown to reestablish normal bioelectric states, suppressing tumor growth and enhancing tissue repair (Meijer & Geesink, 2017).

    • Therapeutic frequencies in the microwave and millimeter wave ranges have demonstrated the ability to reverse pathological water structures in cancer cells, restoring their hexagonal phase and reducing malignancy (Kalantaryan et al., 2024).

  • Bioelectric Modulation:

    • Targeting bioelectric signals, such as membrane potentials and ion channel activity, offers a promising approach to normalize cancer cells’ behavior and inhibit metastasis (Draguta et al., 2019).

    • Techniques like electric field therapy and bioelectric circuit manipulation aim to disrupt cancerous bioelectric patterns while promoting healthy tissue regeneration.

  • Electromagnetic Targeting in Cancer Therapy:

    • Enhanced electromagnetic fields generated by centrosome clusters in cancer cells have been exploited to attract magnetically charged nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery (Huston, 2015).

    • Advances in terahertz spectroscopy and imaging provide diagnostic tools to detect electromagnetic abnormalities in early-stage tumors, guiding personalized therapeutic interventions.

Discussion: The role of electromagnetic fields in cancer highlights the intersection of physics and biology in understanding malignancies. Cancer can be seen as a state of electromagnetic decoherence, where disrupted bioelectric and EM signaling undermines cellular coordination and tissue integrity. Addressing this decoherence through coherent electromagnetic interventions presents a paradigm shift in oncology, emphasizing systemic restoration over localized treatment.

Conclusion: Cancer’s association with disrupted electromagnetic fields underscores the importance of coherence in maintaining biological order. By leveraging insights into bioelectric and EM dynamics, researchers and clinicians can develop innovative therapies that restore systemic balance and inhibit tumor progression. Continued interdisciplinary research is essential to unlock the full potential of electromagnetic approaches in cancer prevention and treatment.

Keywords: cancer, electromagnetic fields, bioelectric signaling, coherence, tumor microenvironment, therapeutic frequencies, biophotons.

-Text generated by AI superficially, for more specific but also more surprising data check the tables below-

Very related sections:

expand upper introductory text Generate PDF ⇊ Paginate ≣

text updated (AI generated): 23/12/2024
tables updated (Human): 11/01/2025

Endogenous Fields & Mind
EM & Cancer

Endogenous Electromagnetism & Cancer

(F) Full or (A) Abstract

Available Formats

Title

Commentary

Publication Year (and Number of Pages)

Author(s)
SEE ALSO THIS (subsection on ELF applied to cancer cells)
OR THIS (subsection on biophotons differently emitted by cancer cells).
Favailable in PDF, HTML and EpubExternal low energy electromagnetic fields affect heart dynamics: surrogate for system synchronization, chaos control and cancer patient’s healthCommentary icon2025-(13)Frederico P. Costa, Jack Tuszynski, Antonio F. Iemma, Willian A. Trevizan, Bertram Wiedenmann, Eckehard Schöl
Favailable in PDF and HTMLBiophysical control of plasticity and patterning in regeneration and cancerCommentary icon2023-(23)Nirosha J. Murugan, Solsa Cariba, Sawith Abeygunawardena, Nicolas Rouleau, Samantha L. Payne
Favailable in PDF and HTMLViolation of molecular structure of intracellular water as a possible cause of carcinogenesis and its suppression by microwave radiation (hypothesis)Commentary icon2023-(6)Vitali Kalantaryan, Radik Martirosyan, Yuri Babayan, Voldemar Petrosyan
Favailable in PDFPhysical aspects of chemical carcinogenesis [preprint]Commentary icon2023-(23)A. P. Batyanov
Favailable in PDF and HTMLUHF-Dielectrophoresis Microfluidic Lab-on-a-Chip to Detect the Transformation Potential of Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Cancer Stem Cells [preprint]Commentary icon2022-(21)Élodie Barthout, Élisa Lambert, Céline Hervieu, Sofiane Saada, Rémi Manczak, Julie Pannequin, Arnaud Pothier, Claire Dalmay, Fabrice Lalloué, Muriel Mathonnet, Barbara Bessette
Favailable in PDF and HTMLA computational model of organism development and carcinogenesis resulting from cells’ bioelectric properties and communicationCommentary icon2022-(14)Joao Carvalho
Favailable in PDFThe Understanding of Enigmas Related to Cancer: Cancer Origin and Progression- A ReviewCommentary icon2021-(9)M. T. Hasan
Favailable in PDF and HTMLA bioelectric model of carcinogenesis, including propagation of cell membrane depolarization and reversal therapiesCommentary icon2021-(11)Joao Carvalho
Aavailable in HTMLBioelectrical approaches to cancer as a problem of the scaling of the cellular selfNo comments yet icon2021-(1)Michael Levin
Favailable in PDF and HTMLElectric Fields at Breast Cancer and Cancer Cell Collective GalvanotaxisCommentary icon2020-(11)Kan Zhu, Nicholas R. Hum, Brian Reid, Qin Sun, Gabriela G. Loots, Min Zhao
Favailable in PDF and HTMLCancer Development and Damped Electromagnetic ActivityCommentary icon2020-(17)Jiří Pokorný, Jan Pokorný, Jitka Kobilková, Anna Jandová, Robert Holaj
Favailable in PDF and HTMLMeasuring Cellular Ion Transport by MagnetoencephalographyCommentary icon2020-(8)Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Sauparnika Vijay, Sangram Gore, Timothy M. Dore, Ramesh Jagannathan
Favailable in PDF and HTMLBioelectric Control of Metastasis in Solid TumorsCommentary icon2019-(17)Samantha L. Payne, Michael Levin, Madeleine J. Oudin
Favailable in PDFDisturbance of bioelectric transmission in carcinogenesisCommentary icon2019-(5)Ilarion Draguta, Anatolie Mustea, Constantin Popescu, Cornel Iurcu, Valeriu Palade
Aavailable in HTMLStem Cell Differentiation Stage Factors and their Role in Triggering Symmetry Breaking Processes during Cancer Development: A Quantum Field Theory Model for Reprogramming Cancer Cells to Healthy PhenotypesNo comments yet icon2019-(1)P.M. Biava, F. Burigana, R. Germano, P. Kurian, C. Verzegnassi, G. Vitiello
Favailable in PDFCatalase intrinsic emissions of electromagnetic fields as probable cause in cancerogenesis from consumption of red and processed meatNo comments yet icon2018-(8)Abraham A. Embi
Favailable in PDF and HTMLWarburg effect—damping of electromagnetic oscillationsCommentary icon2017-(9)Jiří Pokorný, Jan Pokorný, Fedir Borodavk
Favailable in PDFCancer is promoted by cellular states of electromagnetic decoherence and can be corrected by exposure to coherent non-ionizing electromagnetic fields [preprint]No comments yet icon2017-(45)D.K.F. Meijer, J.H. Geesink
Favailable in PDF and HTMLEndogenous electromagnetic forces emissions during cell respiration as additional factor in cancer originNo comments yet icon2016-(3)Abraham A. Embi
Favailable in PDF and HTMLA Review of Electromagnetic Activity in Cellular MechanicsCommentary icon2016-(12)Ronald L. Huston
Favailable in PDF and HTMLEnergy parasites trigger oncogene mutationCommentary icon2016-(7)Jiří Pokorný, Jan Pokorný, Anna Jandová, Jitka Kobilková, Jan Vrba, Jan Vrba Jr
Favailable in PDF and HTMLMitochondrial Dysfunction and Disturbed Coherence: Gate to CancerNo comments yet icon2015-(21)Jiří Pokorný, Jan Pokorný, Alberto Foletti, Jitka Kobilkova, Jan Vrba, Jan Vrba Jr
Favailable in PDF and HTMLUsing the Electromagnetics of Cancer’s Centrosome Clusters to Attract Therapeutic NanoparticlesCommentary icon2015-(10)Ronald L. Huston
Aavailable in HTMLOn Centrioles, Microtubules, and Cellular ElectromagnetismCommentary icon2014-(1)Ronald L. Huston
Favailable in PDFOncology and Biophysics: A Need for IntegrationNo comments yet icon2014-(6)Sarah S. Knox, Richard H.W. Funk
Favailable in PDFCancer - pathological breakdown of coherent energy statesNo comments yet icon2014-(19)Jiří Pokorný, Jan Pokorný, Jitka Kobilková, Anna Jandová, Jan Vrba, Jan Vrba Jr.
Favailable in PDF, HTML and EpubBiophysical Insights into Cancer Transformation and TreatmentCommentary icon2013-(11)Jiří Pokorný, Alberto Foletti, Jitka Kobilková, Anna Jandová, Jan Vrba, Jan Vrba Jr., Martina Nedbalová, Aleš Čoček, Andrea Danani, Jack A. Tuszyński
Favailable in PDF and HTMLPostulates on electromagnetic activity in biological systems and cancerCommentary icon2013-(8)Jiří Pokorný, Jan Pokorný, Jitka Kobilková
Favailable in PDF, HTML and EpubEndogenous Voltage Potentials and the Microenvironment: Bioelectric Signals that Reveal, Induce and Normalize CancerNo comments yet icon2013-(60)Brook Chernet, Michael Levin
Favailable in PDF and HTMLBiological Water Dynamics and Entropy: A Biophysical Origin of Cancer and Other DiseasesCommentary icon2013-(55)Robert M. Davidson, Ann Lauritzen, Stephanie Seneff
Favailable in PDFThe Role of Coherence in a Systems View of Cancer DevelopmentNo comments yet icon2012-(33)M. Plankar, E. Del Giudice, A. Tedeschi, I. Jerman
Favailable in PDF and HTMLCancer physics: diagnostics based on damped cellular elastoelectrical vibrations in microtubulesNo comments yet icon2011-(13)Jiří Pokorný, Clarbruno Vedruccio, Michal Cifra, Ondřej Kučera
Favailable in PDFEmbryonic Morphogenetic Field Induces Phenotypic Reversion in Cancer Cells. Review ArticleCommentary icon2011-(11)M. Bizzarri, A. Cucina, P. M. Biava, S. Proietti, F. D’Anselmi, S. Dinicola, A. Pasqualato, E. Lisi
Favailable in PDFA chronic decrease of heart rate variability can precede some cases of cancerCommentary icon1997-(9)Sv. Danev, S. Svetoslavov, E. Datzov

.

.

Go to top of the page